Monday, December 31, 2012

Virtual-itis: Part One




VIRTUAL-ITIS:  A Socratic Dialogue with a Modern Christian. 
The dialogue takes place during sleep, in a dream.
                                                        
        Only the soul can experience an absence that is  presence, an emptiness that is  filling, a longing that is an enjoying.  Such an experience occurs when the soul awakens and comes alive in the remembrance of Selfless Love.  Today this experience is more and more absent to us and as a result our hungers have no meaning.  We fill ourselves obliviously with empty data, factoids, and bytes.  Diversions, distractions, multiply like virtual loaves. Only in the silent, empty desert will the Mystery of Selfless Love once again dazzle us.
                                                
Voice: Why do you sleep so fitfully? What bothers you?
Modern Christian:  What? Who are you? Am I dreaming?
V:  You may call me Socrates. I was sent to help you know yourself better. Yes, you are dreaming, but the dream is real, more so than the daytime hours you spend walking around in a fog.
MC: How can I be sure? Maybe I am having a nightmare, or going crazy. 
 V: You are already driving yourself crazy. Yourwhole life is a nightmare of worry and anxiety. Do not be afraid of me. You have nothing to lose and much to gain. Tell me: what is bothering you?
MC:  Well, I am having a hard time making decisions.  I can’t sort out my thoughts and feelings and come to a conclusion.   One day one thing seems good to me, the next day something else. Why can’t I be as sure of myself as I used to be?  
V: You may have a common yet unrecognized virus that infects much of the world's population,  a virus called  “virtual-itis.” This is a sickness that comes from a loss of contact with reality. How serious the sickness is depends on how far removed you are from reality. May I ask you some questions? I need to see how badly this virus affects you.  
MC:   What harm can it do?. Ask away. What would you like to know?  
V: Does your mind feel like a cargo crate or like your stomach?
MC:  I don’t understand.  My mind doesn't feel like anything. Not like a cargo crate, not like my stomach. What are you getting at?  
V:  A cargo crate can be empty or full. But it is indifferent to both emptiness and fullness.  It is neither happy nor unhappy over what is placed in it.  Like a cargo crate, your stomach can be empty. But the stomach knows it is empty.  That’s why you feel hungry!  So the stomach is not indifferent to being empty.  Nor is the stomach indifferent to what gets put in it.  It wants tasty food that nourishes it, food that contains the vitamins, minerals, carbs, and proteins which the rest of the body needs.  And after it gets that stuff, the stomach knows what to do with it.  It knows how to break it down and what to send where.  The stomach finds satisfaction in fullness and frustration in emptiness. 
MC. Okay, okay, enough already!  I see what you mean. But I thought the mind was like a blank slate. Isn't that  how the mind works, something like a slate on which you write information?  I thought being a brainy, knowledgeable person meant you had gathered up a lot of information and knew how to use the information to get what you wanted.
V:  That would reduce the brain pretty much to a computer memory bank.  But the brain is more  like a smart cat playing with a ball of string. The cat pokes it, rolls it, runs around it, pounces on it, backs off and leaves it there,then jumps on it again. Of course, if it is a mouse or a canary instead of a ball of string, when the cat is finished playing with it, he finally eats it.  That’s the way the mind works. It plays with an idea, looks at it from one angle and then another, compares it to this and that. The mind questions and pokes the idea and rolls it around before deciding whether or not to leave it be or eat it. Sometimes the mind will swallow it.  And once your mind swallows the idea, it also knows what to do with it.  
MC: Sorry, you are losing me.  What are you getting at? 
V:  Just as the stomach cannot use any old thing we put into it, the mind is meant to take in truth. The hunger of the mind is for truth. The mind is nourished by truth, not just by information or data or factoids.  Today we seem to have forgotten that a mind cannot be healthy without truth. We think just having a crate full of data is enough to fill us. 
MC:  I see what you're saying.  What food is to the stomach,  truth is  to the mind.  How about this: two people discussing an idea are like your two cats, playing with a ball, rolling it around, back and forth to one another. Isn't that a good image for two persons having a discussion or a brainstorming session or even a debate? As they toss the idea around they clarify it, see it differently, and maybe help it acquire depth they didn’t know was there before.   That’s what you mean by the mind being like a playful curious cat, and not just a blank slate, right? 
V: Yes.  You do begin to see!  Healthy people have that kind of mind that is inquisitive, searching, and hungry for truth. They are interested in learning more and more about the truth they already know.  Unhealthy people have a mind like a crate or slate, they don’t care what is inside or written on it, nor have a sense of what to do with what they have inside. The truth to them is just a lot of data or information.  You, on the other hand, may get healthy by talking to me. 
MC. By healthy or unhealthy I presume you are referring to this virus you are talking about?  Virtual-itis?  
V. Yes.   A crate type mind is one symptom of the disease.  Another is a spectator mentality.  That means you...
MC. Wait a minute! I don't buy everything you have said. It is your opinion, and you have a right to it. But I see things a different way. I have a different value system. You don't have any right to impose your way of seeing on me. I am free to see things the way I want therm to be.
V. No you are not. You are free to accept reality or deny it. But once you deny reality, you separate yourself from truth and start living by self deception.
MC. This conversation is over! Go away! Sneak into my head some other day. I don't want to play mind games with you any more right now.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Pope Benedict: The Coming of Christ to us

Christ...is the living Torah, 
God's gift to us, 
in whom we receive all the wisdom of God.
In being united to Christ, in the 'co-journey' and the 'co-life' with Him,
we ourselves learn to be upright men, we receive the wisdom that is truth, 
we know how to live and die, 
because He is the Life and the Truth...

In early Christianity, it was like this: being free from the shadow
of groping along in ignorance- 
What am I ?
Why am I?
How should I move forward?-
being made free, 
being in the light, 
in the fullness of the truth. 
This was the fundamental awareness, 
a gratitude that radiated around and united people in the Church of Jesus Christ...

No one can say"I have the truth"- this is the objection raised- and rightly so,
 no one can have the truth. 
It is the truth that possesses us, 
it is a living thing! 
We do not possess it but are held by it.
Only if we allow ourselves to be guided and moved by the truth, 
do we remain in it. 
Only if we are, with it and in it, pilgrims of truth, 
then is it in us and for us.

 From Pope Benedict's Mass homily on September 2, 2012, Mariopoli Center, Castel Gandolfo

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Mystery in Relationship with Us

"The Most Holy Trinity is relationship.
Grace is relationship.
The Church is relationship.
Priesthood is relationship. 
Consecrated Life is relationship. 
Marriage and Family Life is relationship. 
Education is relationship. 
Formation is relationship." 


The Sign
I  first saw the above quotation hanging on a wall in the administration building of Holy Apostles Seminary in Cromwell, Connecticut. The wall-hanging was meant to embody the "raison d'etre" of the place, the reason why the seminary exists, its goal, purpose, rationale, philosophy, theology, spirituality, methodology, and anything else that could be said about an institution whose purpose is to train men for the priesthood. I read it through the first time, simply because it was something to do as I was  waiting for 10:00 am to arrive so my meeting would begin. Then I read it a second time, more slowly and attentively, because the first reading had started working on me, working in me, waking me up to ramifications and implications. So I sat down and thought about it a bit, until I got distracted by people passing by and nodding a greeting to me.  Next the meeting took place, and an hour or so later, I drove back home, forgetting about the sign till it sprang up in my mind later in the afternoon. I knew I wanted a copy, and the friend I had met with soon emailed it to me. It has been the basis for reflection ever since.

What is it a sign of?
In general, of our involvement with Mystery, of Mystery's involvement with us,  as well as the Mystery of our involvement with each other. How Mystery sustains us, connects us, interrelates us, moves us, inspires us, works in us, purifies us, teaches us,  helps us grow, etc. It is a sign of the coherence and meaning all things have because of Mystery, and of how that meaningful coherence would be unrecognized and unexpressed except through the unique creature that each one of us human beings is,  and how even through us Mystery remains always greater than whatever meaningful coherence we get a glimpse of.

Why is everything reduced to "relationship" in the quotation?
"Reduced" is the wrong verb to use.  It would be better to say "open to". Relationship is not reductive nor limited in meaning even though our understanding of relationship  is.  For example,"reduction" would be the right term to use in talking about relationship if we make the mistake of thinking our intelligence is the measure of relationship. This would be an example of rationalism, a misuse of reason that limits its reach.

 Relationship is so open,  elastic and expansive that it unites God and all of creation, heaven and earth, time and eternity. For us, for God, for all creation, to be is to be with. Relationship is the heart of everything. It pertains to Father, Son and Holy Spirit; to Creator and creature; to time and eternity; to matter and spirit; to the Sacraments that make us one with God and one another in Christ; to family life and consecrated life; to any and everything that is. The initiative of relationship come from  Mystery, as well as the grace and freedom in us to say "yes" to the initiative. One of the marvels of relationship with God is we have the freedom to say yes or no to it.

Mystery is always in right relationship with us. It would be impossible for Mystery not to be in right relationship with us, since our very being depends upon it. From our side,  relationship with Mystery can go wrong in an infinite number of  ways, while there is only one way of it being right. How can that be? Can Mystery be in right relationship with us even while we are in wrong relationship with It? How is it possible for us to be in wrong relationship with It? By finding ways to say "no" while Mystery mercifully continues to say "yes".


An old Scholastic adage helps me to understand relationship  a bit:"Receptum in recipiente segundum modum recipientis,"which in English comes across as: What is received (the receptum) is in the receiver (in recipiente) according to the mode of the receiver (segundum modum recipientis). What we have of Mystery in us depends on our capability of receiving It. That capability is built into us, and is itself received, as is our very being.  In a sense that capability is our whole being as well as a part of our being. I didn't start myself up or bring myself into being. My existence was given me, and is given me at present as well. My being and everything in it is constituted by my relationship with Mystery. Even that, however,  is an inadequate way of expressing the way things are.

Why? It is true, isn't it? 
Yes. But it is "more" truth is than I am able to intuit, consciously experience, or fully comprehend.  Why? Because I am not the measure of Mystery. Can a painting comprehend the painter, a symphony its composer, or a statue its sculptor?  No. Each is an expression of its maker, but there is more to the maker than a particular expression. No creature can ever be the measure of the Creator. As creatures, we can only be something of an image and likeness, since that is what is given us to be. Yet Christ is both the painter and he  who jumps into his painting, the author who becomes a character in his book, the potter who becomes clay he molds. Relationship with Mystery is present, yet inexplicable, unforeseen and unforeseeable, unfathomable in its gratuitousness..
 Since it is my nature to be created, at every moment of my being I have to be held in being by Mystery. I am not self sustaining. If I were, I would not be a creature, one whose being is out of nothingness and who has no ground of being except Mystery. At root, I am only because Mystery is. The question for me is not Hamlet's famous "To be or not to be", since I inescapably am. Rather, the question is how I choose to be.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Flannery O'Connor: on Mystery and the Educated Mind

"The type of mind that can understand good fiction is not necessarily the educated mind, but is at all times the kind of mind that is willing to have its sense of mystery deepened by contact with reality, and its sense of reality deepened by its contact with mystery."  Flannery O'Connor

I came across that quote some time ago as I was reading Heather King's blog, Shirt of Fire. My face lit up  with delight and the thought ran through my mind: I have to put that in my blog. It sounds just like something Giussani would say. I don't know if Fr. Giussani ever read Flannery, but I'm sure he would have loved her if he did. They both have the type of mind that sees reality in relationship to mystery, and mystery in relationship to reality. It must come from life long practice, because it sure isn't an ego skill like being a professional writer or theologian or a teacher, but a faith virtue that is ingrained in disciples by  following their Master. Since Christ Himself is the right relationship between all of reality and the Mystery of  God His Father,  and since Christ lives that relationship in our human flesh,  our following Him in faith gives us in the correct perspective towards God and man. 


Friday, December 7, 2012

Prayer: Sainthood for Fr. Giussani

O Merciful Father, we thank You for having given your Church and the world the Servant of God, Fr. Luigi Giussani. He, with his life lived with passion, taught us to know and love Jesus Christ present here and now, to ask Him with humble certainty that "the beginning of every day be a yes to the Lord who embraces us and makes fruitful the soil of our heart for the accomplishment of His work in the world, which is the victory over death and evil."

 Grant, O Father, through the intercession of Fr. Giussani, according to your will, the grace we implore, in the hope that he will soon be numbered among your saints.

 Through Christ, our Lord. Amen

                                                                                                            Veni Sancte Spiritus. 
                                                                                                             Veni per Mariam